Skip to Main Content

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): AI Generated Content (AIGC)

On this page, you will find some tips to help evaluate the quality of AI-generated content (AIGC).

Text generated by XIPU AI (GPT 4)

XIPU AI:

Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) refers to any type of content - text, images, videos, music, etc., that is generated or created by artificial intelligence. AI leverages machine learning algorithms and models to learn from vast amounts of data. After training, it can generate new, original content that closely matches the patterns, structure, and style it learned from the training data.

In terms of text, AI models such as GPT-3 and BERT can generate human-like written content, while in the realm of images and art, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can create realistic-looking images or even artwork. Deepfake technology, which uses AI to superimpose images and videos onto source media, is another example of AIGC.

While AIGC opens up new horizons in content creation, it also comes with challenges and ethical considerations, particularly in terms of copyright, authenticity, and the potential for misuse. So, any technology involving AIGC needs to be employed thoughtfully and responsibly.

XIPU AI:

Evaluating content generated by Generative AI can be complex due to the creative nature of its output. However, these are some commonly used criteria for assessing the results:

  1. Quality: The generated content should have high quality. For instance, in the context of text, it should be grammatically correct, coherent, and contextually appropriate. In case of images, the visual details should be clear and realistic.

  2. Relevance: The content generated needs to be relevant and appropriate to the inputs or the prompt given.

  3. Diversity: A robust generative model should produce a diverse range of outputs. It proves that the AI isn't just rehashing its training data, but can generate novel, varied content.

  4. Novelty: The generated pieces should be original and not just replicas of the examples present in their training data. For tasks that require creativity (like creating artwork or music), the AI's ability to produce unique and appealing content is important.

  5. Consistency: The generated content should be consistent. For instance, when generating a story, the AI should sustain the same narrative or theme from beginning to end.

  6. Controllability: Depending on the use case, there might be a demand for controlling the generation process within certain specified constraints. A capable Generative AI should allow for this controllability.

Evaluating these criteria can lean on both automatic metrics (like BLEU for text or Inception Score for images) and human judgment. Often times, a combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments will yield the most comprehensive evaluation of a Generative AI's performance. It's also worth noting that the best method of evaluation can often depend on the specific task and domain at hand.

* Text generated by XIPU AI.   Try asking these questions in XIPU AI.

What's AIGC?

What's AI Generated Content  (AIGC)?

In simple terms, AI Generated Content refers to the content produced by AI tools in response to input prompts.

More detailed information, please refer to these papers:

Content Evaluating

As with all sources of information you use for your study, a critical evaluation of the resource should be undertaken. However, there is currently no universal evaluation standard for AI generated content(AIGC). Generally, "CRAAP" Test criteria are used to evaluate the information and the framework can also be applicable to AIGC:

  • C stands for Currency, underscoring the timeliness of the information;
  • R stands for Relevance, evaluating how well the information aligns with your specific needs;
  • A stands for Authority, exploring the credibility and expertise of the information source;
  • A stands for Accuracy, scrutinizing the reliability and correctness of the information;
  • P stands for Purpose, revealing the underlying reason for the existence of the information.

For further reading: